How to avoid cluttering your cast with false promises
Naming a character is a declaration: “This person matters.” It’s a signal flare to the reader that says, Pay attention. But when names are handed out like party favors to one-scene baristas and shuttle pilots, the result isn’t clarity—it’s cognitive clutter.
🚫 Why Over-Naming Hurts Your Story
- False Expectations: A named character implies narrative weight. If your protagonist chats with “Lieutenant Brask” in Chapter 2 and Brask never returns, readers may spend the next ten chapters wondering when he’ll reappear with a plasma rifle or a secret agenda. In Juxtapose City by Tricia Owens, names are used with precision—each one signals a role in the unfolding tension, whether political, romantic, or tactical. That’s the kind of narrative gravity that earns a name.
- Cognitive Overload: Every name is a memory checkpoint. If your reader has to remember “Todd the clerk” who sells a datapad and vanishes, that’s mental bandwidth better spent on your actual plot. In The Silver Ships series by S.H. Jucha, the cast is lean and purposeful—named characters tend to matter, and that clarity helps the story move.
- Streamlining the Narrative: A focused cast keeps the story tight. If your vampire queen meets a one-scene blood courier, he’s “the courier,” not “Derek.” Unless Derek’s going to betray her, seduce her, or turn out to be her long-lost brother, let him stay anonymous. Joely Sue Burkhart’s Queen series is a great example—named characters are either emotionally resonant or plot-relevant, often both.
✅ Naming with Purpose
- Name characters who shift the plot, deepen the world, or carry emotional weight.
- Let minor roles stay minor—“the medic,” “the archivist,” “the grumpy werewolf.”
- Use naming as a signal, not a habit.
In speculative fiction and paranormal romance, names are more than labels—they’re narrative promises. Make sure yours are worth keeping.