Making Plot Events Matter to Your Main Characters: Why Stakes Should Be Personal

A well-constructed story isn’t just a sequence of events—it’s a journey where plot developments deeply impact the main characters. While secondary characters help shape the narrative, it’s the protagonist’s struggles, choices, and consequences that create emotional resonance. If the stakes aren’t personal, why should the protagonist care? And if the protagonist doesn’t care, why should the reader? (Spoiler: They won’t.)

Why Main Characters Should Feel the Full Weight of the Plot

When major story events happen primarily to side characters, the protagonist risks feeling passive. A reactive main character—one who simply watches things unfold—can lead to weak storytelling. Imagine Dune if Paul Atreides just stood on the sidelines while the Fremen handled everything. Sure, the spice must flow, but not without him.

Here’s why keeping stakes personal enhances engagement:

• Emotional Connection: Readers are invested in the protagonist. If a disaster, conflict, or revelation primarily affects someone else, it creates emotional distance.
• Character Growth & Change: A strong story arc forces the protagonist to evolve. If the plot primarily impacts side characters, the protagonist misses key opportunities for transformation.
• Maintaining Narrative Focus: A story should center on the main character’s journey. If the primary tension constantly shifts to side characters' struggles, the protagonist can start to feel secondary in their own story.

Example: The Fifth Season by N.K. Jemisin

Essun doesn’t just experience personal stakes—she is drowning in them. Her home is obliterated, her son is dead, and the entire planet is actively trying to kill her. The world-ending chaos isn’t an abstract apocalypse; it’s her apocalypse. A lesser protagonist might have given up, but Essun makes every choice count, forging ahead in a world literally crumbling beneath her.

Common Pitfalls That Make Side Characters Carry Too Much Weight

• Secondary Characters Solving Problems: If the protagonist is consistently bailed out by supporting characters rather than resolving their own conflicts, it weakens their agency. (Protagonists aren’t meant to be passengers in their own books.)
• Major Events Happening Around the Protagonist, Not To Them: If a war begins, a secret is revealed, or a major loss occurs—but the protagonist is only tangentially involved—the emotional stakes feel diluted.
• Overloading Secondary Characters with More Drama Than the Protagonist: If side characters consistently have bigger, more compelling problems than the main character, it can divert attention from the story’s true focal point.

Example: Mistborn by Brandon Sanderson

Vin begins her story navigating betrayal and survival on a daily basis—so when she steps into a world of magic and rebellion, the stakes feel real. She’s not just toppling a system; she’s learning to trust, finding her own identity, and facing choices that will shape her fate. And when things go sideways (because of course they do), she does not sit back and let the side characters handle it. She becomes the linchpin.

How to Make Plot Events Directly Impact the Protagonist

• Tie Events to the Protagonist’s Emotional Arc: Whatever happens in the story should challenge their beliefs, relationships, or goals.
• Ensure the Protagonist Makes Choices That Drive the Story: Rather than being swept along by external events, they should make decisions that shape the narrative.
• Let the Protagonist Struggle, Win, and Lose: If consequences fall primarily on side characters, the stakes may not feel real. Let the protagonist feel the weight of their decisions.

Example: Dune by Frank Herbert

Paul Atreides doesn’t get a free pass to leadership; he earns it through pain, loss, and existential dread. Every choice he makes—from fleeing Arrakis to embracing his role in Fremen society—comes with consequences that ripple through the narrative. The universe isn’t simply unfolding around him. It’s pressing against him, demanding action. And like any great protagonist, he steps up, takes the blows, and reshapes fate itself.

Final Thoughts

Your protagonist isn’t just there to witness the plot—they’re there to shape it, be changed by it, and wrestle with its consequences. If the story could happen with a different main character and feel the same, the stakes aren’t personal enough. Give your protagonist choices that matter, conflicts they can’t escape, and consequences that cut deep—because that’s what makes a story unforgettable.

Formatting Scene Breaks: Guiding Your Reader Through Transitions

A well-placed scene break is like a subtle nod to the reader—it signals a shift in time, location, or perspective without breaking immersion. Choose the right one, and your story flows effortlessly. So, what works best for your novel? Let’s explore.

How to Visibly Mark a Scene Break

✅ Blank Line Space - A simple but effective pause between paragraphs.

✅ Centered Symbols - Common options include:

• *** (three asterisks)
• ### (pound signs)
• §§§ (section marks)

✅ Custom Decorative Glyphs - Some genres favor unique symbols that match their theme.

✅ Numbered or Titled Divisions - When transitions are major, a heading can help.

✅ Drop Cap or Styling Change - A visual cue, like an enlarged first letter or italics, signals the shift.

✅ Horizontal Rule - A thin divider spanning the page creates a clear separation.

✅ Typography Adjustments - Font or formatting shifts (such as bold dialogue entries) can mark a change.

✅ Chapter Break Instead - If the shift is significant, starting a new chapter may be more effective.

How to Choose the Right Scene Break

• Genre Considerations: Fantasy and historical fiction often embrace decorative glyphs, while contemporary novels may favor minimalist formatting.
• Pacing Needs: Simple line breaks encourage smooth reading, while dramatic visual cues signal major turning points.
• Story Tone: Horror novels might benefit from stark typography shifts, whereas whimsical fantasy might lean into ornate scene markers.

Final Thought

Scene breaks aren’t just formatting—they’re a part of storytelling rhythm. The right transition method keeps your readers engaged and guides them through your world with seamless clarity.

Anachronisms: Why They’re Bad (Except When They Aren’t)

Anachronisms—the placement of objects, language, or ideas in a time period where they don’t belong—are often seen as immersion-breakers. Whether it’s a medieval knight checking their phone or a Viking chieftain casually discussing democracy as if they had just binge-watched a political documentary, these misplaced details can yank readers out of a carefully crafted world.

But while unintended anachronisms can be jarring, writers who use them intentionally may discover a powerful storytelling tool.

Why Anachronisms Cause Problems

For most writers, anachronisms happen by accident. They often stem from unconscious assumptions or oversights. Here’s why they’re usually problematic:

• Breaking Immersion: Readers engage with a story by believing in its world. If a wizard in a high-fantasy setting casually quotes corporate jargon (“Let’s circle back to that potion formula.”), it fractures the illusion. Even minor slips can make a well-built setting feel hollow.
• Historical Inaccuracy: Many readers—especially in genres like historical fiction—expect a certain level of authenticity. If a medieval adventure introduces tomatoes and potatoes in a European setting decades before they were imported, some readers will catch the error.
• Confusing the Audience: Even in speculative fiction, where the rules are more flexible, unintentional anachronisms can disrupt consistency. If a steampunk world suddenly introduces fingerprint-scanning technology without explanation, it leaves readers questioning the logic of the setting.

When Anachronisms Are Useful

Not all anachronisms are bad. Some authors use them deliberately for stylistic or thematic effect:

• Humor & Satire: Anachronisms can fuel comedic storytelling. Monty Python and the Holy Grail delights in absurdity—modern police interrupt a medieval tale, characters reference contemporary problems, and historical accuracy is cheerfully abandoned for entertainment.
• Alternative History & Speculative Fiction: Some stories thrive on rewriting history. A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court builds an entire plot around a time traveler introducing modern knowledge to the medieval world. Similarly, in the movie Army of Darkness, Ash’s chainsaw-wielding antics in the Middle Ages are an intentional clash of eras that fuels the film’s cult status.
• Stylized Dialogue: Writers sometimes modernize speech for accessibility. An authentically period-accurate dialect may alienate contemporary audiences, so strategic anachronisms—like streamlined dialogue—help bridge the gap between historical realism and readability.

How to Handle Anachronisms Wisely

• Research Thoroughly: When writing historical fiction, speculative worlds, or time-specific narratives, fact-checking prevents awkward missteps.
• Consider Your Audience: Are they expecting rigorous accuracy, or would they enjoy a playful twist? Reader expectations should guide how anachronisms are handled.
• Use Intentional Anachronisms: If an anachronism serves a clear purpose—whether comedic, thematic, or accessibility-driven—it can enhance a story rather than detract from it.

Anachronisms are like seasoning: too much can overwhelm a story, but the right amount adds flair. Used thoughtfully, they can entertain, illuminate, and even elevate a narrative beyond strict historical constraints.

How Reader Expectations Change Over Time: Why Yesterday’s Style May Not Work Today

Storytelling isn’t static. It shifts with culture, publishing trends, and evolving reader habits. A novel written in the 19th century differs dramatically from today’s speculative fiction bestsellers—not just in language and style, but in pacing, accessibility, and narrative structure.

Yet some writers struggle to understand why sprawling descriptions, slow-moving scenes, or exhaustive historical detours don’t resonate with modern audiences the way they once did. After all, if Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables sprawled across two dense volumes, shouldn’t today’s readers still appreciate patience in storytelling?

Why Older Storytelling Styles Don’t Always Work Today

1. Changes in Attention & Pacing

Modern speculative fiction thrives on immersive world-building that doesn’t stall momentum. While classics embraced lengthy exposition, contemporary audiences favor a balance—action, setting, and character woven seamlessly together.

Think Martha Wells’ The Murderbot Diaries versus Frank Herbert’s Dune. Wells keeps pacing sharp, even while exploring AI autonomy, whereas Dune indulges in meticulous political world-building that wouldn’t land the same way with today's mainstream audiences.

2. Evolution of Language & Readability

What felt natural centuries ago often reads as dense or outdated today. Compare Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein with modern AI-driven narratives like Wells’ All Systems Red, and the difference is striking—scenes that once unfolded over multiple pages now rely on precise, efficient storytelling.

Readers expect clarity, and stylistic shifts reflect this. Long-winded prose isn’t inherently bad—but accessibility matters.

3. The Influence of Visual & Digital Media

Cinema and television have reshaped expectations. Readers accustomed to tightly scripted pacing often find excessive description frustrating—why spend five pages on a spaceship’s interior when a single establishing shot in film can do the job instantly?

Today’s speculative fiction benefits from dynamic storytelling that echoes cinematic structure. Visual media has conditioned readers to expect streamlined world-building, often delivered on the move, rather than lingering in description-heavy passages.

4. Recognizing Genre-Specific Expectations

Different genres set different expectations for pacing, world-building, and narrative density.

For example, epic fantasy fans often expect gradual world-building, layered exposition, and deep lore—as seen in Brandon Sanderson’s Stormlight Archive, where readers settle into expansive histories, intricate magic systems, and detailed political landscapes. The slower, immersive storytelling suits the genre’s grand, epic scale.

Meanwhile, cyberpunk thrillers thrive on sharp dialogue, fast tension, and immediate narrative stakes—exemplified by William Gibson’s Neuromancer, where clipped prose, fragmented world-building, and immersive futurism pull readers into a hyper-digital, high-stakes landscape without extensive setup.

Recognizing what your audience expects ensures that your pacing, level of description, and narrative focus align with the genre’s natural rhythm.

---

How Writers Can Adapt Without Losing Depth

1. Trim Excessive Detail—Let Action Drive World-Building

Descriptions should enhance immersion without stalling momentum. Instead of ten pages of battlefield setup, let sensory details unfold within the action—like how N.K. Jemisin’s Broken Earth Trilogy balances intricate world-building with character-driven stakes.

2. Keep Emotional & Character Stakes Strong

Readers connect more with consequences than prolonged exposition. Even AI-driven sci-fi thrives on emotional resonance—The Murderbot Diaries proves that introspection can drive narrative just as effectively as futuristic world-building.

3. Balance Tradition with Modern Accessibility

Layered themes, symbolism, and intricate world-building still work, but they must be paired with contemporary pacing strategies.

James S.A. Corey’s The Expanse is a perfect case—it embraces deep political intrigue, but never loses momentum.

---

Final Thoughts

Writers who recognize evolving reader expectations craft stories that feel timeless yet engaging. The goal isn’t to strip away depth, but to shape it in ways that resonate with modern speculative fiction audiences—without forcing them to wade through endless pages before reaching the starship’s launch bay.

Burying Dialogue in Fiction: How to Keep Conversations Clear and Engaging

Picture this: your rogue trader is pinned behind a bulkhead, pulse rifle humming with residual heat, and her second-in-command blurts out the plan mid-blaster fire … except the reader’s knee-deep in a wandering paragraph, misses the line entirely, and suddenly has to scroll back up to figure out what’s happening.

That’s the risk when burying dialogue in fiction.

If you've ever had to retrace your steps just to remember what a response was actually responding to, you've seen this problem in action.

What Is Burying Dialogue in Writing?

It happens when a sentence of dialogue is nested too deep inside action, description, or introspection—so much so that it gets lost.

Often, this comes from a well-intentioned desire to balance:

• Character thoughts with plot movement
• Rich description with pacing
• Body language with subtext

But when a crucial response arrives three paragraphs after the original statement—buried under exposition about a character’s childhood trauma or the glint of starlight on a shattered viewport—the reader has completely forgotten what was asked.

And that’s where flip-back frustration kicks in.

The Problem With Burying Dialogue

When dialogue is too deeply embedded in other prose elements, a few things happen:

• The conversation loses clarity—readers forget what the response is reacting to.
• It slows pacing—especially in fast-moving scenes where snappy exchanges are needed.
• It interrupts immersion—forcing readers to stop and reorient themselves.

Imagine your protagonist and their crew planning an escape:

• One character asks, “Where’s the nearest exit?”
• Instead of answering right away, the author adds two paragraphs of interior monologue about the character’s past experiences with locked doors.
• Then, finally, comes the reply: “There’s a service hatch on Deck Five.”

The problem? By the time readers reach “Deck Five,” they’ve forgotten there was a question at all.

How to Keep Dialogue Clear and Unburied

1. Keep Responses Close Together

When characters are speaking, don’t let entire paragraphs of exposition interrupt a reply.

Buried:

“We need to reroute through the maintenance shaft—sensors are blown.”
She glanced at the hull breach, remembering her father’s voice warning her about structural weaknesses. The first time she’d been on this ship, she’d traced the burn marks, wondering if they told a story. The years had worn on, and now she found herself here again, staring at the same blast damage.
“Fine. But you’d better be right.”

Better:

“We need to reroute through the maintenance shaft—sensors are blown.”
She glanced at the hull breach. Same burn marks. Same risks.
“Fine. But you’d better be right.”

This keeps the conversation intact instead of scattering replies through a dense paragraph.

2. Use Beats That Serve the Dialogue

Body language and sensory details should reinforce the dialogue, not bury it.

For example:

“I don’t trust them,” he said, eyes tracking the shadows just outside the forcefield.

The beat adds atmosphere but doesn’t interrupt the flow.

3. Control Paragraph Density

If a single paragraph combines interiority, action, dialogue, and reaction, clarity suffers.

If the reader has to pause, re-read, and dig for spoken words, the rhythm is off. Break up dense prose where needed.

4. Avoid Accidental “Head Fog”

When a character is juggling heavy emotional introspection, ensure dialogue remains distinct from their inner thoughts. Readers shouldn’t have to guess what was spoken aloud.

Even William Gibson’s Neuromancer—psychedelic as it is—manages to separate Case’s haze from his actual speech (most of the time).

---

Final Thought: Keep Dialogue in the Reader’s Line of Sight

Immersive storytelling doesn’t mean drowning conversation in exposition. If your characters are speaking, let their words breathe.

If your dialogue matters, don’t let it suffocate.

Even when the hull’s breached and the android is bleeding metaphors.